The Nature of the Choice to Focus

Home Forums Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand Reading Group The Nature of the Choice to Focus

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #29880
    Steve Chipman
    Participant

    At the bottom of page 58 of OPAR it states “the choice to focus, Miss Rand used to observe, is like throwing a switch; it may be compared to starting a car’s motor by turning on the ignition.” This description implies that focusing is binary – either you are “on” or “off”. More convincing to me is the statement further up on page 58 “To ‘focus’ one’s mind means to raise one’s degree of awareness. As mentioned on page 56 “As there are degrees of visual acuity, so there are degrees of awareness at the conceptual level.” The choice to focus, as I understand it through introspection, is more like deciding how much to “bear down” mentally to achieve a conceptual task ie how much mental effort to expend. It is akin to deciding how much weight to lift at the gym. Thus, if I am reading a light novel or a topic I am already familiar with, it takes less mental effort than reading a new article on a conceptually demanding one. If so, the choice to focus is more the choice on whether to go up on the continuum of mental awareness than whether to be simply “on” or “off”. What do you think?

    #29907
    Jon Hersey
    Keymaster

    I think I agree, Steve. And as you note, Peikoff’s account seems to switch between a continuum to a binary choice. If Peikoff were here to respond, I think he’d say that the binary choice to focus comes first, and then you can “bear down” and decided to go to 100%. But I’m not sure, and the text seems to slip between these two accounts without much clarity.

    As to the facts of the matter, I think its introspectively obvious that when we wake up in the morning, we fairly quickly focus our minds, and then we have the ability to regulate our level of focus up or down.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.