Environmentalists Show Their Disregard for Human Life

by Thomas Walker-WerthPolitics & LibertySep 20, 2021

Over the past week, environmentalist “protesters” affiliated with the “Insulate Britain” movement have twice blocked the M25, Britain’s busiest motorway. The reaction from the British police has been absurd. They’ve given these rights violators multiple polite warnings and allowed them to block the road by sitting in front of traffic for hours before any arrests were made.

The “protests” directly resulted in, among other things, a woman suffering permanent life-changing paralysis from a stroke because they blocked her route to the hospital. Another woman had to be air-lifted to the hospital following a serious car crash caused by the disruption. Both protests caused six-hour delays, preventing thousands of people from getting to work and damaging countless businesses at a time when many are struggling to recover from the COVID-19 lockdowns.

These events highlight the fundamental nature of the environmentalist movement. Its proponents hold “the planet” as more important and more valuable than human life. They are happy to inflict harm on human life to  “protect” the Earth from people. In truth, the morally significant value of planet Earth comes from its importance to human life. Human beings are the only beings capable of forming concepts such as value or morality. Without human beings no moral worth of any kind could or would exist. As philosopher Ayn Rand observed in Atlas Shrugged, “’Value’ presupposes an answer to the question: of value to whom and for what?” And the only beings capable of answering such questions—or any questions—are human beings.

The M25 “protests” show the anti-human morality that underlies the environmentalist movement. Concern for the environment—meaning: clean air and water and livable temperatures—is valid, because human life depends on such an environment. But when people invert the moral fundamentals and put the environment above human life, human suffering ensues. Putting human life in its proper place—as the source and objective standard of moral value—leads to innovation, growth, and flourishing. Doing so also leaves roads unblocked by so-called “protesters” so that people can think, act, and live.

On Solid Ground

On Solid Ground is the hub for content from OSI fellows and affiliates, along with announcements about OSI’s programs and events. Here, you’ll find links to our team’s articles, videos, and other materials published across various platforms. And you’ll discover opportunities to support and engage with our global community.

Latest Blog Posts

Christian Theist vs Objectivist Atheist

by Maddox LocherPhilosophy

Nov 21, 2025

Maddox (Objectivist, ex-baptist) and Jake (a Baptist pastor) confront their deepest disagreements about God, morality, and the foundations of truth. They explore whether faith or reason is the more reliable path to knowledge—and how each shapes our understanding of good and evil.

Moral Realism vs. Anti-Realism Is a False Alternative

by Craig BiddlePhilosophy

Nov 21, 2025

Most philosophers claim you must choose between moral realism and moral anti-realism—but that dichotomy is a trap. In his video, Craig breaks down both categories, shows why they fail, and explains the overlooked third option: moral objectivism. You’ll see how values arise from the factual requirements of human life—and why that changes the entire debate.

Northanger Abbey: A Mystery of Motive, Not Murder

by Angelica WerthArt & Culture

Nov 21, 2025

In her new Substack post, Angel discusses Northanger Abbey—a light, fun story about an innocent girl, captivated by Gothic tales, who begins to learn how the “real world” works and how to recognize people’s less-than-innocent motives.

Objective Standard Institute’s 2024 in Review

by Craig BiddleAnnouncements

Nov 17, 2025

OSI advanced its mission—and your values—beautifully in 2024. Here are some highlights of our projects and programs throughout the year.